Was the Holy Name of YHVH in the original Gospels

--Sharing our Saviour Yahushua the Messiah to the World!--

-Please Read this FIRST- On this site we prefer to use the actual Name of our loving Heavenly Father as it was written in the Word, and thus you will note that we will use the Four Letter “Memorial Name” of - YHVH, which is pronounced as YaHVaH or YaHWaH. In addition we will also use our Heavenly Father’s attribute/title, which is Elohim rather than “God,” which sadly is the name of a pagan god. In addition we also love to use the actual and real Name of our beloved Messiah which is - Yahushua or Yahshua in short, for this is our Saviours original Hebrew Name as given to Him at birth in Lukas - Luke 1:31. This was the only Name ever used when He was on the earth by His family, disciples and His followers OVER THE centuries, even until today! However, it was changed to a foreign name by the founder of the new “pagan church of Rome.” Occasionally, we may also use other Hebrew or Greek names as well as different words in our studies for certain common words used are from pagan backgrounds and thus are not suitable. All names will be translated when they are FIRST used in a study or at various times as needed for clarity. There is a full explanation of YHVH’s blessed “Memorial Name” as well as the wonderful blessed Name of our Messiah and Saviour, thus please read … “The Memorial Name.”

Was the Divine Name of YHVH in the Original Gospels?

And the New Covenant?

Was the Tetragrammaton (four letter) Name of YHVH in the Gospels & New Covenant?

The question above has been long debated by many, but not by the clergy at large for it has been generally held by the vast majority of the church that the “Tetragrammaton,” the Hebrew four letter “Memorial Name” was ever written in the Brit Chadashah – the New Covenant. However, we do need to understand that the Brit Chadashah or at least all four Gospels were originally written in Hebrew and not in Greek for this did not happen until a good two hundred years after the original works were written! I have a comprehensive study online that proves this from the word and history! See the Index and the study “Aramaic or Hebrew.” However, when the Four Gospels were translated into Greek, the “Tetragrammaton,” the Hebrew four letter “Memorial Name” remained until it was finally removed.

However, there is further proof regarding the actual Name of YHVH being in the Brit Chadashah that comes from a most unexpected source and that is from certain rabbis from ancient times and we all know that they obviously rejected our Messiah Yahushua! Thus they did not have an agenda as they argued about how to destroy scrolls of the Brit Chadashah that had come into their possession, as for them these books had no value and were simply full of falsehood and the sooner they threw them in the rubbish the better. But there was a big problem that caused a huge debate amongst these rabbis.

What we are about to read comes directly from the writings from these rabbis who have written their man made laws and commentaries on the laws of the Scriptures in a massive work that is far bigger than even the Tanach it self, and they dare to call it the “Oral Law,” but it is also known as the Talmud.

In a section named “Talmud Shabbat 116A” there is a deep discussion amongst a number of rabbis around 100 and 135 CE (AD) regarding the laws on how and when a Torah Scroll can be burned if damaged or defiled. The general consensus is reached that even in scrolls that have damaged or blank spaces it must not be burned. However, the topic that was raised in 116A was regarding certain Scrolls known as the “Gilyon,” which may have “blank spaces in the Books” (plural) of the “Minim,” who they considered to be the “Nazarene heretics,” but were in fact the writings of the Apostles of Yahushua and how these Scrolls should be handled. The word “Gilyon” means “Gospel” or “Good tidings.”

Therefore the issue here is that the Gospels in the Brit Chadashah (New Covenant) actually contained the “Tetragrammaton,” the Divine “Memorial Name YHVH - .”

“YHVH Elohim of your fathers, the Elohim of Avraham, the Elohim of Yitzchak - Isaac, and the Elohim of Ya’akov - Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is My Name forever, and this is My memorial unto all generations.” Shemos - Exodus 3:15.

The question these rabbis argued about was how should they handle these so-called heretical books? “Can we really burn them?”

In verse 16 as per below, one of these rabbis questions if their Torah Scrolls with the Divine or Sacred Name are the issue. Another answers “NO.” He is referring to the gospel (blank spaces) of the books of the Nazarene heretics. In other words the Gospel books are not regarded in the same light as the Torah Scrolls.

However, then comes another point of view for another one rabbi states that on a weekday when it’s not the Sabbath we must get the “Gilyon” – the books of the Gospel and remove all the Divine Names before we burn the books. But another rabbi who completely disagrees with him, states that these books are trash that he would burn them even without removing the Divine Names! Even if he had to take the books to a pagan temple should a Nazarene follow and chase him to get the gospels back.

We need to remember, as I indicated earlier the Talmud is NOT scripture, but only the words of fanciful men who have misled Jews and placed the burden on all Israel what is called the rabbinic (manmade) laws, and if you will remember that our Saviour fought these laws fiercely as did the disciples, but He, nor the disciples ever stood against the Father’s blessed Law, and sadly that is the big mistake that the church has made, that makes them somewhat similar to those very rabbis, yes even the Pharisees!

However this writing in “Talmud Shabbat 116A” has given us some incredible and wonderful historical confirmation of what many of the true believers in Messiah Yahushua already know in our heart and spirit, that the original Brit Chadashah or Books of The “Gilyon” (Gospels) originally contained the Divine and “Memorial Name” of YHVH, and not “KURIOS.” It is a very simple fact, if the four letter Name of Elohim, YHVH was not clearly present in the Hebrew Brit Chadashah then known as the Books of “Gilyon,” why would the rabbis spend all that time arguing and deciding how to destroy the “Gilyon” without desecrating the Divine Name in them. Sadly the glorious Name of the Father was removed by church leaders, and I can only question WHY? Mind you Israel did exactly the same and both the church and those who blinded Israel will be punished beyond belief!

Now we will read some of the actual text taken directly from the Soncino Talmud, which will give you an idea of the struggle between these rabbis of what they were to do, for there was the question of the most Divine Name of the Almighty in Hebrew of course in the “Gilyon” (Gospels).

“Come and hear: The blank spaces above and below, between the sections, between the columns, at the beginning and at the end of the Scroll, defile one's hands. 13 - It may be that [when they are] together with the Scroll of the Law they are different.14 Come and hear: The blank spaces 15 and the Books of the Minim 16 may not be saved from a fire, but they must be burnt in their place, they and the Divine Names occurring in them. Now surely it means the blank portions of a Scroll of the Law? No: the blank spaces in the Books of Gilyon - Gospels. Seeing that we may not save the Books of Minim themselves, need their blank spaces [DIVINE SACRED NAMES] be stated? - This is its meaning: And the Books of Minim are like blank spaces.

It was stated in the text: The blank spaces and the Books of the Minim, we may not save them from a fire. Rabbi Jose said: On weekdays one must cut out the Divine Names which they contain, hide them, 17 and burn the rest. Rabbi Tarfon said: May I bury my son if I would not burn them together with their Divine Names if they came to my hand. For even if one pursued me 18 to slay me, or a snake pursued me to bite me, I would enter a heathen Temple [for refuge], but not the houses of these [people], for the latter know (of God] yet deny [Him], whereas the former are ignorant and deny [Him], and of them the Writ saith, and behind the doors and the posts hast thou set up thy memorial.19 Rabbi Ishmael said: [One can reason] a minori: If in order to make peace between man and wife the Torah decreed, Let my Name, written in sanctity, be blotted out in water, 20 these, who stir up jealousy, enmity, and wrath between Israel and their Father in Heaven, how much more so; 21 and of them David said, Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? And am I not grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate then with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies. 22 And just as we may not rescue them from a fire, so may we not rescue them from a collapse [of debris] or from water or from anything that may destroy them.

Rabbi Joseph b. Hanin asked Rabbi Abbahu: As for the Books of Be Abedan [Ebionites], 23 may we save them from a fire or not? - Yes and No, and he was uncertain about the matter. 24 Rab would not enter a Be Abedan, and certainly not a Be Nizrefe [HOUSE OF NAZARENES]; 25 Samuel would not enter a Be Nizrefe [HOUSE OF NAZARENES], yet he would enter a Be Abedan [HOUSE OF EBIONITES]. Raba was asked: Why did you not attend at the Be Abedan? A certain palm-tree stands in the way, replied he, and it is difficult for me [to pass it]. 26 Then we will remove it? - Its spot will present difficulties to me. 27 Mar b. Joseph said: I am one of them 28 and do not fear them. On one occasion he went there, [and] they wanted to harm him.”

Obviously our beloved Lord and Saviour was very adamant about His faithful praying as follows … “Our Father In heaven, hallowed be Thy Name” and obviously the Name was of great importance and was NOT to be hidden, That is also why He so clearly asked of His faithful …

“And I will do whatever you ask in My Name, so that the Son may bring glory to the Father. You may ask Me for anything in My Name, and I will do it.” Yochanan - John 14:13-14.

Yet, the churches do not pray and use the Name above every name as was originally given to our beloved Messiah, He who freely gave His life, who His Father rose from the Dead, and He rose to return to sit at the right hand side of the Father, and He will come again very soon! His Name is of course Yahushua. Some have asked me, how do you know that? That is so easy, just look up you concordance, lets say Strongs, for it does not take a genius, for our Saviours Name is the same as that of Joshua, which in Hebrew is also Yahushua. Thus what does Strongs have to say about the Name of our Lord and Saviour?

NT:2424: Iesous (ee-ay-sooce'); of Hebrew origin [OT:3091]; Jesus (i.e. Jehoshua), the name of our Lord and two (three) other Israelites. OT:3091: Yehowshuwa` (yeh-ho-shoo'-ah); or Yehowshua (yeh-ho-shoo'-ah); from OT:3068 and OT:3467; Jehovah-saved; Jehoshua (i.e. Joshua), the Jewish leader: Jehoshua, Jehoshuah, Joshua.

We need to realise that the Hebrew alphabet never had and still does not have a “J” only a “Y” thus it is Yahoshua, or Yahushua, and the latter is 100% correct. The name “Jesus” was created from the Greek “Iesous”, which only came about long after the original Gospel’s were written and were translated into Greek and it is generally said that in Greek they could not use a Y, or J, they made up a new name. However, the question does beg, why then does Joshua (Yahushua) who walked with Moshe (Moses) manage to have his name that sounds very much like His original name? However, The King of kings and Lords of lords was given a name that is closely associated to the Greek god Zeus. This is clearly explained in the study “Memorial Name.”

Below are two pages from “The Jewish Encyclopaedia” that explain the “Gilyon(im)” (plural - Gospels). It commences on page 668 right hand side - “GILYONIM ( … = “Gospels”; Lit, “scrolls”):

Summing up:

Therefore the Brit Chadashah did originally have the blessed and Divine Name of YaHVaH in it, but sadly it was removed by the church of Rome, we may ask, “What’s new about that?” These are the same people that changed so many of the commandments that our precious Saviour Yahushua gave us and they even made His Words a mockery. They changed the day of worship from the seventh day to the “Venerable day of the SUN” which is now on a SUNday, which commenced earlier, but it was made law (Blue Law) by Constantine in 321 AD. The Babylonian church has completely taken all that was good and true and influenced many of the true faith, and although many protestant churches have broken away, but they still took with them huge chunks of the Babylonian theology, for they continue to celebrate two pagan feasts, one of fertility and the other being the feast of the equinox, neither have anything to do with our Messiah and Saviour whatsoever as they both predate Him by over a thousand or more years!

And what do christians do? Sadly 99.5% just follow these false or just misled preachers like sheep, for beloved it seems like the greater church is not much more than a KFC church and sadly it has been like that for far too long, thus many will say, “But how can it be so wrong?”

All I can say to you is beloved, please read the blessed Word of YaHVaH Elohim and the warnings as given by our beloved Saviour, for it is all there. If we are right about our Saviour’s Name and frankly that cannot be disputed, unless you dispute the Word of the Almighty as well as the Strongs Concordance, then I am sorry to say you will have to take your chance with your salvation, for there is no security in any other Name under the heaven and the earth but that of the Name of Yahushua, “The Name above all names.”

“For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile, the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on Him, for everyone who calls on the Name of the Lord will be saved.” Romans 10:12-13.

WARNING “The wages of sin is death” and right now if you continue to worship with what has become, I am so sad to say, with a satanically inspired greater church who will continue to use the name “Jesus” which beloved is in truth a satanically inspired pagan name directly related to “Zeus,” there will be little hope when our blessed Saviour Yahushua comes again in the very near future. Who is really running the church?

“That serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth and his angels were cast out with him.” Revelation 12:9.

This piece of Hebrew text dates is believed to be from around the 2nd Century CE (AD) and it was discovered in May 2009 in Israel

But beloved, if you start praying in “the Name above all names,” the Name of Yahushua and the most Divine Name of YaHVaH and use the attribute/title of our Heavenly Father, which is Elohim, rather than “God” (which is really the name of a pagan god/gad/gawd of fortune as stated in the book of Yeshayahu – Isaiah) I believe that blessings will come your way!

“This is good and it pleases Elohim our Saviour, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one Elohim and one mediator between Elohim and men, the man Messiah Yahushua, who gave Himself as a ransom for all men, the testimony given in its proper time.” 1 Timotheos – 1 Timothy 2:3-6.

Please be assured that this study has been written with much love and a great deal of prayer, for it has taught us that YaHVaH’s Divine Name, blessed be He, was originally in the Hebrew manuscripts of the “Gilyon” or “Brit Chadashah” the New Covenant and later removed. We must ask ourselves, why has it disappeared from the Scriptures and who was responsible?

We all know that canonisation of the “Christian Latin & Greek Bibles” came out of the so-called orthodox churches of Rome and Constantinople, etc. This will certainly not give us too much assurance as both were steeped in Babylonian customs based on that evil sorcerer, Simon Magnus’ teachings and his teachings continue to this day.

Recommended reading: Read the book “The Two Babylons” by Rev. Alexander Hislop written in 1853. It provides a very deep insight of the pagan church of Rome and sadly many of her influences has remained in all churches to this day. If you wish a copy of the book just email me and I can send you a pdf version of the book!

This is An Essay on Easter from “The Two Babylon’s written in 1916 and written by Alexander Hislop

Also Read Simon Magnus - the First Bishop of Rome

“Teach me Your way, O YHVH. I will walk in Your truth.
UNITE MY HEART TO FEAR YOUR NAME!”

Tehillim – Psalms 86:11

May YHVH Elohim bless and keep you in the palm of His hand always, in Messiah Yahushua’s loving Name!

The RETURN Movement name was founded in 1978.

RMI Ministries International - The International Ministry.

Search this Site

site search by freefind advanced

*************************************

Return to our Site Index

Or our MainPage

www.rmi-ministries.com

Yahushua said; “No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day. It is written in the Prophets: They will all be taught by Elohim. Everyone who listens to the Father and learns from Him comes to Me. No one has seen the Father except the One who is from Elohim; only He has seen the Father. I tell you the truth he who believes has everlasting life.” Yochanan (John) 6:43-48.

Please Note: RMI Ministries International and associated ministries are 100% non-profit outreach ministries.

As we do not market, or sell anything or ever request funds by any means, including the sending of any of those

so called “News,” or better said; “Beg-letters.” Upon receipt of an email we do not retain any details on a database,

neither will we ever send any follow up emails, but only reply if we have been requested

Do you have any questions? You are welcome to email us …

Click the inkbottle to email us!

info@rmi-ministries.com

The RETURN Movement International

--Established in 1978--

Quotations are derived from various versions of the Word
including KJV/NKJ/NIV/Hebrew/Greek translations by the Webmaster, and Messianic versions.

Although the author does not believe in having to copyright his studies, but there have been occasions where there parts

of his studies have been taken and quoted out of context under his name, and thus he has been misquoted by

those who had their own reasons for doing so. Thus, it is only for this reason these works